Screening for cholera biofilm inhibitors

Candidates—Kelly Peach, Nicholas Shikuma, and Walter Bray, UC Santa Cruz

Nominated by Roger Linington, UC Santa Cruz

The Deloitte QB3 Award for Innovation recognizes a graduate student, postdoc, staff scientist, or team from UC Berkeley, UC Santa Cruz, or UCSF who has made an advance with the capacity to improve human health. Candidates for were nominated by QB3 faculty. Finalists were chosen by a panel of expert judges.

We asked each nominee (or team) to answer a series of short questions, to give a snapshot of their project. Read their answers below. Leave a comment below to let us know what you think!


Walter, Kelly, and Nick of the Santa Cruz biofilm team.

Please describe your innovation.
We developed the first reported high-throughput, epifluorescent screen for identification of compounds that inhibit biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Although biofilms are responsible for a 10-1000 fold increase in antibiotic resistance and mediate 60% of all human bacterial infections there are no commercially available therapeutics. Current methods used to screen chemical libraries are limited by indirect detection of inhibitor action and low-throughput formats. Our approach enables image-based identification of hits and distinguishes them as either antibiotics or biofilm inhibitors in a single screening event. Our system does not require specialized equipment, and screening can be completed in a single day.

Within the 140-character Twitter limit:

What’s the impact?
Antibiotic resistant biofilms mediate 60% of bacterial infections. There are no commercially available drugs; our screen will identify potential drugs. #winning

What’s the novelty?
The first high-throughput, image-based assay for biofilm inhibitors in V. cholerae. Performed in 1 day to rapidly classify compounds as antibiotics or inhibitors

What’s the utility?
This screen streamlines inhibitor identification and will provide compounds for use as coatings for medical implants or as components of antibiotic cocktails


Cholera bacteria can form a biofilm (left) that enhances their survival. Drug compounds that disrupt biofilm formation (right) will reduce virulence.

How does your research topic represent a strong advance in human health? And how will it influence the way we operate in science in the future?
Preventing biofilm formation will eliminate biofilm-mediated resistance to host immune responses and traditional antibacterial treatments. Considering biofilms contribute significantly to the pathogenicity of Vibrio cholerae, removing the capacity to form biofilms will reduce virulence. Epifluorescence microscopy coupled with new bioinformatic tools allows identification of subtle biofilm-related phenotypes at the primary screening stage. Streamlining the discovery process will move compounds to the development phase more quickly. Biofilm inhibitors will afford the development of coatings for medical devices burdened by biofilm colonization and usher in the use of sophisticated antibacterial cocktails containing antibiotics and biofilm inhibitors.

Reference:
An image-based 384-well high-throughput screening method for the discovery of biofilm inhibitors in Vibrio cholerae
Kelly C. Peach, Walter M. Bray, Nicholas J. Shikuma, Nadine C. Gassner, R. Scott Lokey, Fitnat H. Yildiz and Roger G. Linington
Mol. BioSyst., 2011, 7, 1176–1184

Comments

I vote for the well-designed Cholera Biofilm Inhibitors lab.

Hi Benson— if you haven’t done so already, cast your vote via the embedded survey at http://qb3.org/research/deloitte-qb3-award-innovation

Thanks for participating!

This sounds quite interesting.  I hear that bacterial biofilms can be a real problem in implantable medical devices.  Are  your screens for preventing biofilm formation, attacking them once they're formed or both?  Also have you also studied other bacterial strains that are problematic with med devices? 

Thanks for your question Ron.
 
Currently we pin the compounds immediately after the culture is dispensed, so our screen was designed to find compounds that prevent biofilm formation.  However, it would be simple to incubate the plate to allow for the biofilms to establish before pinning any compounds to evaluate the ability for drugs to disperse preformed biofilms.  We have discussed this, and may begin screening with both strategies in the future. 
 
Our group is currently developing the screen to look at Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well.  Patients with cystic fibrosis struggle with chronic respiratory infection caused by infections caused by this bacteria, so this will be of clear medical relevance. 
 
There has also been some evidence in the literature that biofilm inhibitors lack cross-organism selectivity.  Diversifying the screen will also allow us to see whether the compounds we find are organism specific or may be effective against a broad range of bacteria.
 
I hope this answers your question, and feel free to respond if not.
 
-Walter

Add new comment

Filtered WYSIYWG

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <div> <class> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.